4 ms·
Your demands are completely unreasonable, a weapon platform can be extremely effective in its role and not win a war outright. Yeah drones aren't magically solv
by some_random 3y ago
Your demands are completely unreasonable, a weapon platform can be extremely effective in its role and not win a war outright. Yeah drones aren't magically solving the problem of minefields, so what?
- hef19898 3y agoMy point was exactly that: no weapon system is a silver bullet, including drones. And just because something is old doesn't make it less useful. And I didn't make any demands, not sure how you woupd read that into my answers to a thread started with "dropping stuff from drones is an attack that cannot be countered". People didn't learn anything it seems, first tanks were obsolete, until Ukraine wanted every single one of them. Then modern AA made fighters and helicopters obsolete, only to be replaced by drones as the latest shit. Those arguments are just cheerleading whatever is en vogue and hyped.
- jncfhnb 3y agoI’m not seeing your quote. Tanks being obsolete is… not clear. Tanks vs. western anti tank missiles and drones dropping grenades does feel like a terrible ROI but they are still useful. Russia doesn’t have these things at the same level of efficacy so tanks are perhaps more valuable for Ukraine to have. Helicopters and fighters are in the same boat. They’re useful, but vulnerable and expensive. The thing about drones is they cost $200 to take out weapons that cost up to millions of dollars.
- some_random 3y agoYou have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, tanks, fighters, and helicopters are not obsolete by any stretch of the imagination.
- hef19898 3y agoThat's why I always said the opposite. Internet, media and pundit opinion on the other hand...
- some_random 3y agoSo what's your actual argument here? Drones bad because new? Drones bad because minefields? Drones bad because mean people on the internet like them?