3 ms·
Well, to be fair, they claimed to increase the output by 20x, not the efficiency. Though I do admit, I'm also skeptical. On stuff like this, though, it's hard
by jlarocco 15y ago
Well, to be fair, they claimed to increase the output by 20x, not the efficiency. Though I do admit, I'm also skeptical.
On stuff like this, though, it's hard to tell if it's the "journalist" screwing it up, or if the original data is flawed.
- Ralith 15y agoIt doesn't matter whether they claimed output or efficiency. If the efficiency is currently on the order of 20%, then the output is about 0.2 times the energy absorbed. If we multiply that by twenty, we end up with an output 4 times the energy absorbed, which is of course impossible.