3 ms·
If the 30k per figure was accurate (I don't think it is?) it would be certainly unreasonable for the rest of the society to subsidize it. So I guess, no. But t
by fjgvcjygjvh 3y ago
If the 30k per figure was accurate (I don't think it is?) it would be certainly unreasonable for the rest of the society to subsidize it.
So I guess, no. But they shouldn't expect other people to finance their sex lives.
- elil17 3y agoThe options aren't shell out $30k/year or let people get AIDs. There's a missing third option: don't let drug companies charge so much money, especially when the government paid for the development of the drug!