3 ms·
I personally feel it is NIMBY. They actually provide a useful service. They would like NOT to have clusterfucks because they are dangerous to their operations.
by RealityVoid 3y ago
I personally feel it is NIMBY. They actually provide a useful service. They would like NOT to have clusterfucks because they are dangerous to their operations. The noise level is much improved in this design. I think an honest shot is worth it.
- tgv 3y ago> They would like NOT to have clusterfucks That's not based on actual experience. And it isn't a useful service, IMO. It's another attempt to sell something that's currently shared (air-space, silence), while not offering benefits in a city. In remote areas, it could offer something, but I'm sure the big bucks are to be found in densely populated areas.
- RealityVoid 3y agoYeah... people pay for it... because it's useful. That's usually how money works. I am kind of irked by this pervasive cynicism on HN where whenever some guys want to build something, the crowd goes "boooo, you're stealing from us!! This won't work!!! There will be some cost and we're not willing to pay anything!! "
- broken_clock 3y agoThere is a new externality that they're not paying for. I don't care if other people pay for it, I want to be reimbursed for the externality it causes me.
- jdminhbg 3y ago> It's another attempt to sell something that's currently shared (air-space, silence) Silence isn't part of the tradeoff, since delivery trucks and vans are much louder. And I prefer giving up airspace to deliveries, since my kids aren't playing in the airspace.