2 ms·
Ok, but we got PNG for that. Photos usually don't contain transparencies, so why have several Megapixel/Megabyte large PNGs?
by martin_a 3y ago
Ok, but we got PNG for that. Photos usually don't contain transparencies, so why have several Megapixel/Megabyte large PNGs?
- xena 3y agoBecause JPEG XL has smaller file sizes, which saves you money in the era of Managed NAT Gateway's 7 cents per gigabyte egressed.
- baq 3y agoWhy not have one format good for everything image? There's zero reason to not have it now. Would you say 'We got GIF for that' if asked for animation?
- pmarreck 3y agoI think animation is also part of the JXL spec, although may not be part of the reference implementation yet =)