3 ms·
> elections are for. Making an effectively irreversible decision after single vote won with a slim majority seems like not the brightest idea. They should’ve
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
> elections are for.
Making an effectively irreversible decision after single vote won with a slim majority seems like not the brightest idea.
They should’ve had a referendum to approve the negotiated deal and if that failed started the entire process all over.
- simonh 3y agoI completely agree, the referendum was deeply misconceived from the start. I'm just pointing out that the electorate also have a responsibility to evaluate that and factor it into their decision. I certainly did. Blaming politicians, other than as individuals, doesn't work. The electorate put those politicians in their positions in the first place. The responsibility always lies with us. If a voter votes for an arsehole who lies and deceives them, yes the arsehole is responsible for the lies and deception, but ultimately the decision to trust them with power is on the voter. It's on us to do our homework.