3 ms·
If the policy is “Fuck you, your tie sucks”, then that should be written into the policy. YouTube’s policy does not say “Fuck your, your tie sucks.” They say t
by marcell 3y ago
If the policy is “Fuck you, your tie sucks”, then that should be written into the policy.
YouTube’s policy does not say “Fuck your, your tie sucks.” They say they remove people for harm to users. But there are many creators who harm users who are not being removed. So that is not the policy.
They can easily fixing this by changing the policy to “fuck you, your tie sucks” or “we ban for any reason at our discretion.”
Until they make that change, it’s perfectly fair to point out the contradiction.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Nursie 3y ago> They can easily fixing this by changing the policy to ... “we ban for any reason at our discretion.” What makes you think that isn't already in their ToS?
- pixl97 3y agoPretty much a staple of US law is "We withhold the right to refuse service to anyone". There are only a few preconditions (civil rights for example) that are exceptions to this rule.
- pixl97 3y ago>then that should be written into the policy. Please feel free to take them to civil court and get the mto change it. Now, I'm not one for this entire "corporations are people too" thing we have going on in the US, but trying to call Google out for this in particular when the courts have sided with businesses freedom of association until it becomes a civil rights violation in the vast majority of cases. You can point out it as much as you like, but it's mostly a waste of your time until you start championing for 'consumer rights'.