3 ms·
Fair points, but it doesn't answer the question asked - what are his "inalienable rights" and where should that line drawn? GPs examples were good - banks, taxi
by TheHappyOddish 3y ago
Fair points, but it doesn't answer the question asked - what are his "inalienable rights" and where should that line drawn? GPs examples were good - banks, taxis, etc. Should his local cafe be allowed to refuse service?
- mrkeen 3y agoI think I changed my mind a little based on the reply. When I think about how I would use youtube (signup, upload some crap, maybe get a couple of views), it feels like a service which is notionally open to anyone. And I have a problem with someone being denied that, without it going to trial first. And even afterward, too - let the judge apply the sentence; don't have the public decide on extra ways to punish him. But at his level of notoriety I concede that it's a bit more like him being on Netflix. I have no problem with Netflix deciding to greenlight or cancel shows based on the perceived whims of the public (even if they were morons to pull the episode of Community where Chang went Drow-face.) > and where should that line drawn? Even though my comment headed in that direction, it's hard to even imagine what that line would look like. I guess that's why case law exists.