2 ms·
> If you think of magazines, it would be a disappointment for Rolling Stone to contain no ads. I'll bite…because they're pretty? Or because how else would one
by CharlesW 3y ago
> If you think of magazines, it would be a disappointment for Rolling Stone to contain no ads.
I'll bite…because they're pretty? Or because how else would one stay on top of the latest Axe body spray releases?
- saalweachter 3y agoWoodworking magazines are 1/3 about shop organization, 1/3 about project ideas & techniques, and 1/3 about the latest and oldest woodworking tools and where to buy them.
- keepper 3y agoBecause who then pays for the content? Time and time again, the average person has shown that they will rather spend X times more on a trivial thing than content. This is more acute on hard news. Where a single page article may cost 100k to produce, yet wont be able to be monetized per its "cost to produce". So yes, it would be a disappointment to lose "great content". now, here lies in the kicker. You get to decide great content with your patronage ( or lack there of)