3 ms·
My husband, Rob, interviewed at a firm where his HR contact could not understand why my he was upset when an automated email that appeared to be from the HR con
by clarebear 15y ago
My husband, Rob, interviewed at a firm where his HR contact could not understand why my he was upset when an automated email that appeared to be from the HR contact sent Rob his password in plain text. Rob replied to the email to complain, thus actually giving his password to Mr. HR. When Rob continued to complain about this problem, Mr. HR accused Rob of not trusting him and insinuated that maybe the hiring process should stop right there. Rob could not even explain to Mr. HR why he was so upset in a way Mr. HR could understand. So HR departments tend to have very different ideas about passwords than, for example, HN readers.
- rhizome 15y agoIt's a truism that if a business person starts talking about trust, especially in the context of one's own job, you run the other way.
- lukejduncan 15y agoThe university I attended did something similar. To graduate you had to apply online. However, they never actually integrated the graduate application process with their auth process. So when you applied to graduate you had to "sign" your application with your password. This app, password and all, would then be emailed out to everyone in the Records and Registration office. I presume they then manually logged into my account, and if that succeed I had verified my identity. If this password wasn't tied to, say, the ability to take out a student loan then maybe it wouldn't be a big deal. I tried explaining to the person who answered the records office phone that this process was broken and I needed another way to identify myself (I'm an out of state student). They didn't care and didn't understand the issue. No one took me seriously until enough people tweeted about it that a PR person contacted me and had IT fix the problem. So: Mr(s). Non-technical also tend to have very different ideas about passwords than, for example, HN readers.