4 ms·
It’s not clear for people that put their hands over their ears and go LA-LA-LA-LA. Hell, in many places bullshit like that is not even enforceable. There was a
by kaba0 3y ago
It’s not clear for people that put their hands over their ears and go LA-LA-LA-LA. Hell, in many places bullshit like that is not even enforceable.
There was a good comment on one similar threads: oracle is thought as this litigious monster because they provide DRM-free, no phoning home solutions to companies. This is very important for these customers, as you just simply can’t shut down a country’s hospital system because Google or whatever managed to falsely flag it as some malware and now you try to grab onto any form of human contact from their support, without success.
But every sufficiently big company is only after money, so to make some form of profit they do have to actually enforce their contracts somehow, here comes the inspection - which sure suck, but there is no other way around it given the previous limitation. And sure, some higher management can easily have fked up and used some feature that was not part of their plan, and they desperately want to cover up their mishandling, and Oracle “kindly” offers them the option to forget about the fee for that plus option, if you subscribe to this other service of ours for X years, we are good; and higher management couldn’t be happier.
- palata 3y agoThat kind of clarification is very useful (at least to me). I honestly don't really know why Oracle "are the bad guys". I just heard it so much that I accepted it.