> It seems to me that the scientific community's reaction to the replication crisis has been to ignore it. They've always known so there hasn't actually been

> It seems to me that the scientific community's reaction to the replication crisis has been to ignore it. They've always known so there hasn't actually been any new information from which to spur action. In the academic circles I've run in there has always been a strong mistrust of reported results and procedures based on past difficulties with internal efforts replicating results. Basically a right of passage for a grad student to be tasked with replicating work from an impossible paper.