3 ms·
The guy interviewed about his camera technology was desperately trying to pitch it. But I think this is honestly unlikely - watching driver behavior is probabl
by legitster 3y ago
The guy interviewed about his camera technology was desperately trying to pitch it.
But I think this is honestly unlikely - watching driver behavior is probably the worst indicator for drunk driving. You are way better off just using the lane telemetry data.
- dmm 3y ago> watching driver behavior is probably the worst indicator for drunk driving. I think surveillance is (mostly) the point. I guess we'll see. I'd be happy to be wrong.
- legitster 3y agoFor who? The government doesn't specify what technology is required - and most cat manufacturers would probably avoid expensive IR image detection just for compliance.
- jstarfish 3y ago> But I think this is honestly unlikely - watching driver behavior is probably the worst indicator for drunk driving. You are way better off just using the lane telemetry data. Yep. It's the lane drift that would give the cops probable cause to pull you over for DUI in the first place. GPS could attest that you were recently parked at a bar. The most the internal camera might see is an open container.
- dilyevsky 3y agoPretty sure you’re wrong here. There are already gaze tracking systems deployed in cadillacs and other high end cars. It’s probably decently easy to tell if someone is passing out or just not paying attention with a neural net at this point
- legitster 3y ago> high end cars Yes. For premium cars that already have this functionality. But I am pretty sure the Mitsubishi Mirage is not going to add state-of-the-art driver tracking technology to comply with the 2026 law.