3 ms·
Indeed. If his videos are unacceptable, YT should have taken them down. If they're acceptable, then they should give him his money.
by denton-scratch 3y ago
Indeed. If his videos are unacceptable, YT should have taken them down. If they're acceptable, then they should give him his money.
- throwaway5959 3y agoThen people would claim he’s being censored. It’s exhausting.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Marsymars 3y agoI would put forward that a less morally dubious way for YT to handle this would be to pull ads, and send the creator a pay-for-hosting agreement that they're required to sign if they want to keep the content online.