The author gave up the game with the bald-faced assertion that "The reason why it was decided to make it voluntary is because all homeless people according to t

The author gave up the game with the bald-faced assertion that "The reason why it was decided to make it voluntary is because all homeless people according to them are victims of capitalism and would not be fair to have any expectations of them." This is a nonsense straw dog. The author bemoans the lack of "metrics" while neglecting to mention that metrics have shown that Housing First approaches have had a higher success rate than the alternatives. I think the author's treatment at the hands of activists is deplorable but the arguments in the article don't hold water.