5 ms·
The museum lent the artist money as well as paying him to produce the works. Accepting the art submitted does not invalidate the artist's requirement to repay t
by kawhah 3y ago
The museum lent the artist money as well as paying him to produce the works. Accepting the art submitted does not invalidate the artist's requirement to repay the loan.
- dizhn 3y agoThe"artist" seems like the kind of guy who would easily say the quality of "the material (cash) they gave me wasn't good so I used something else instead. So we're even." He's quoted as saying the musemum gained a lot more in publicity without mentioning the publicity he himself got while stealing the museum's money.
- hnbad 3y agoIt's certainly something to hear an artist say that the value they provided in an exchange was exposure. Usually this goes the other way around.
- Brian_K_White 3y agoYou know, what a great observation. That could even be part of it all. It probably wasn't an intentional point but it could be. It is so dead on.
- dagw 3y agoIn the original Danish article he is quoted saying the whole affair has been good for him professionally as well