2 ms·
If it were normal, you would have to reject the “alarming” / “mind blowing” statements in the article. If it were abnormal, on the other hand, it would support
by osigurdson 3y ago
If it were normal, you would have to reject the “alarming” / “mind blowing” statements in the article. If it were abnormal, on the other hand, it would support such claims. This is what the article is about.
- jncfhnb 3y agoNo. That’s my whole point. “Normal” on a geological time scale is completely irrelevant to humans, whose society is built on a tiny stable slice of that timeframe. Geological time scale “normal” includes many states that are not survivable for our societies. What we care about is normal relative to our cozy state that we have now.
- osigurdson 3y agoSo then it is just a regional cosiness thing. If your region benefits from climate change, you should be in support of it and wish to accelerate it.