3 ms·
Yeah WSL1 is underrated - and more elegant IMHO
by prynhart 3y ago
Yeah WSL1 is underrated - and more elegant IMHO
- LoganDark 3y agoI think the reason they gave up is because the Linux kernel has a LOT of syscalls, and every single one would have to be implemented flawlessly in order to properly support all of userspace. They'd basically be implementing a second Linux kernel.
- speed_spread 3y agoAlso because filesystem access translation results in very poor performance vs native Linux filesystem, which is basically insurmountable because of Windows design.
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y agoElegant but really hard to implement and maintain (at least on top of the NT base (which I mention because illumos and some BSDs implement Linux compat more easily by being unix-like in the first place)); it's much like how WINE is pretty decent but will always have more compatibility problems than just running Windows in a VM.