3 ms·
Well, within today's legal system, social media are responsible what's posted on their site.
by rebolek 3y ago
Well, within today's legal system, social media are responsible what's posted on their site.
- akolbe 3y agoIt's not about the content though in this case (God knows there is worse crap on YouTube), but about the person who uploaded it.
- iinnPP 3y agoThe ads I get in Youtube are full of obvious lies, AI generated garbage, clear copyright violations, and worse. What makes matters worse is that comments get disabled aa does sharing. I can't even link to the problem. If I report the ad, it is there again tomorrow. It's almost as if that counts as interaction worthy of trying the ad again. I personally don't like RB. I find the whole act to be off-putting. Though that is most often a sign of others liking the content. I don't think letting the "reason" go unchallenged is responsible given the above.
- notahacker 3y agoHe's not getting a massive boost to his views this week because of the content though, but because he's an alleged sex offender. Of all the people demonetised by YouTube, already rich man can't profit from allegations of sex offences unless he can find brands willing to pay him directly has to be one of the least sympathetic.
- NolF 3y agoWhat's the case law that social meedia sites are responsible for the content on their site? Youtube just recently won the ISIS recruitment case as a counter example [0]. [0] https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1333_6j7a.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1333_6j7a.pdf