> Can you link a study, that makes such a claim? Of course I can, I took it from a study! https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18248 https://www.nature

> Can you link a study, that makes such a claim? Of course I can, I took it from a study! https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18248 https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18248 -------------------- some other studies on the subject, not all agreeing on the conclusions, as it is natural https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29861517/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29861517/ https://www.sciencealert.com/two-more-classic-psychology-studies-just-failed-the-reproducibility-test https://www.sciencealert.com/two-more-classic-psychology-stu... https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2208863120 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2208863120 the real problem is that the kind of psychology studies that gets the more attention on the media, that shape the culture and the beliefs of the general public and that are often used by governs and institutions (even medical ones) to deploy policies, health care plans, school or work environment guidelines, etc. etc. are those that are less trustworthy, that fail to be replicated the most and more subject to interpretations and subjective biases, in particular social psychology (citation: Social Psychology (38% success rate, n = 256).)