> You're not supposed to patent anything you haven't actually made not true. That's Actual Reduction to Practice. There is also Constructive Reduction to Pract

> You're not supposed to patent anything you haven't actually made not true. That's Actual Reduction to Practice. There is also Constructive Reduction to Practice. I wrote about this in depth, for software: https://albertcory50.substack.com/p/no-source-code-no-patent https://albertcory50.substack.com/p/no-source-code-no-patent This is a good place to repeat, "let's just remove software from the patent system." If you don't, then any changes you propose will being the Big Pharma lobby down on you. Once we get our own IP protection laws (or no IP laws), the pharma companies won't care about us anymore.