You keep saying "someone might want to do a bad thing" as if it is an argument. I never said they would do something, which is what you are arguing against. I

You keep saying "someone might want to do a bad thing" as if it is an argument. I never said they would do something, which is what you are arguing against. I said there isn't an excuse to not do anything based on the existing law covering what needs to be covered. Mostly I point it out because the "X government won't do anything" is uninteresting to discuss, it is basically an impossible to defeat argument. > Unless you're just referring to the executive branch the government In this context the branch of the government whose job it is to take this action is taking an action and so I felt specifying Executive was needlessly specific. It isn't like Congress is using this act to go after violators, that isn't their job.