Come to think about it, time vs miles/km feels more natural in most situations I can think of. In London we would describe a journey based on time (or maybe st

Come to think about it, time vs miles/km feels more natural in most situations I can think of. In London we would describe a journey based on time (or maybe stops, but only for very short train journeys) not distance. Same for international travel- measured in flight time not distance travelled. Because in most situations knowing how far away something is takes second place to knowing how long to get there. That’s what is relevant. Now as to this crash location, I guess it means 2 hours by car but yeah it’s more ambiguous than a more widely understood journey.