2 ms·
At first I thought this was about minor changes to formulations that can be granted new patents, a problem which seems to me to be to be outside the FTC's purvi
by adolph 3y ago
At first I thought this was about minor changes to formulations that can be granted new patents, a problem which seems to me to be to be outside the FTC's purview. It looks like the problem is more like out and out fraud:
Brand drug manufacturers are responsible for ensuring their patents are properly listed. Yet certain manufacturers have submitted patents for listing in the Orange Book that claim neither the reference listed drug nor a method of using it.
. . . courts have recognized that improperly listing patents in the Orange Book may constitute an “improper means” of competition. Accordingly, improperly listing patents in the Orange Book may also be worthy of enforcement scrutiny from government and private enforcers under a monopolization theory.
- AlbertCory 3y agoMy take: she has a solid case on this. You build credibility by winning. She hasn't done a good job on that.
- junofan 3y agoThe FTC’s statement cites a Shkreli case. I wouldn’t get my hopes up.
- DangitBobby 3y agoIt is quite clearly fraud. For some reason we don't seem to prosecute companies for fraud.