> They don’t understand how models of the world work. Of course it’s not ideal but it’s a useful framework for understanding things. Based on the rather casual

> They don’t understand how models of the world work. Of course it’s not ideal but it’s a useful framework for understanding things. Based on the rather casual way the author is using language in this piece, I'd bet that the researchers forgot that what they are describing are (nested) model(s) of reality...or that that level of precision is "pedantic" (the consequence being the confusion in this comment section).