2 ms·
You're mistaking operational costs with capital costs. Nuclear has huge up front capital costs, which makes building new plants a non-starter if it is believed
by hn_throwaway_99 3y ago
You're mistaking operational costs with capital costs.
Nuclear has huge up front capital costs, which makes building new plants a non-starter if it is believed that other storage options (including batteries and things like green hydrogen) will be cheaper before the lifespan of a power plant can essentially recoup its large up front costs.
- epups 3y agoNo, I'm not. I'm saying that just because renewables are cheaper, you cannot simply replace anything with them or you would have severe unreliability.