3 ms·
start here: https://github.com/freedomofpress/dangerzone https://github.com/freedomofpress/dangerzone i've never used it, but i've been meaning to check it out
by jiveturkey 3y ago
start here: https://github.com/freedomofpress/dangerzone https://github.com/freedomofpress/dangerzone
i've never used it, but i've been meaning to check it out. at least it should give you a jumping off point for further investigation.
if that is insufficient, use proofpoint.
for archives that are tickling bugs, you have to use a similar technique. it's not enough to analyze them and send them on as-is. you have to unpack in a sandbox (which will be detectable, no 2 ways about it, but the question is will anyone expend enough effort to detect -- no, not for your use case, seeing as how you're asking the question at all), process with dangerzone or dangerzone-like tool, then re-archive it and let the user see only that new archive.