4 ms·
Well, now you need to define "Haskell". Haskell 98 has effectively the same type system as Rust (ignoring lifetimes). GHC does not. I guess I'm not a fan of
by FullyFunctional 3y ago
Well, now you need to define "Haskell". Haskell 98 has effectively the same type system as Rust (ignoring lifetimes). GHC does not. I guess I'm not a fan of the overly abstract types in later GHCs.
- tome 3y agoNormally by "Haskell" I'd mean "GHC", since that's the Haskell that everyone actually uses, but even Haskell 98 has higher-kinded types!