> Or do you have other ideas how to do proper testing? Well, for starters don't call them studies, call them "hunches" or "intuitions" or whatever you like to

> Or do you have other ideas how to do proper testing? Well, for starters don't call them studies, call them "hunches" or "intuitions" or whatever you like to indicate that there is actually no real evidence to prove your thesis. Occam's razor tells us to believe that it's much more plausible that psychologist publish massaged data to keep getting funded, than because it's actually very hard to admit that "we don't know for sure, this study proves nothing". Have you ever heard of my fellow Italian professor Francesca Gino?