3 ms·
I’m not sure there’s much relaxing in quality control in aerospace. The specs are already pretty tight.
by bumby 3y ago
I’m not sure there’s much relaxing in quality control in aerospace. The specs are already pretty tight.
- rbanffy 3y agoYou could, but usually that causes lower performance. When building an airframe, a gram not needed is a gram wasted. In fighters it's far less stringent than spacecraft - for those, even a screw one turn longer than needed is something to avoid.
- bumby 3y ago(FWIW, when I'm saying 'aerospace' I'm using it to jointly refer to "space" and "aeronautics," just in case I gave the impression I was only talking about spaceflight.) Those are technical specs, not quality specs. The quality specs would deal with things like machining tolerances, manufacturer traceability, etc. Point being, if Pratt & Whitney took a seal design from another aircraft to apply to the F-35, it's not like they aren't already tracking the tolerances, material compatibility, etc. When I worked in aerospace, it was very rare that we went to the machine shop to ask for them to make a bespoke component.