As long as it's not just copying and pasting the content I disagree. If I read the article and absorbed it, I have 'learnt' from the content. Then maybe I go o

As long as it's not just copying and pasting the content I disagree. If I read the article and absorbed it, I have 'learnt' from the content. Then maybe I go on to write an article or create content based on what I learnt from your article. Most writing is just this, mixed with people connecting some dots together. How is this different from an AI reading and learning from your content? AI is happening, it's silly to block AI reading your content and fairly egotistical to think that your content really matters. If you are putting it out there for others to learn from, why can't an AI be trained on that data, learn from it and then help others learn from it by using the AI tool, you are still adding to the human pool of knowedege.