I don't personally agree that it should be a lower vertical for a citizen to purchase an RPG with real explosive projectiles, but I think I understand your pers

I don't personally agree that it should be a lower vertical for a citizen to purchase an RPG with real explosive projectiles, but I think I understand your perspective at least. You're either sensitive to a loose interpretation of the words "shall not be infringed," or you believe that those are the kinds of tools citizens would need to overthrow a hostile government (we'd need much more than RPGs but I assume your stance holds strong here all the way up the munitions ladder.) I just personally don't want to be carrying a 10mm pistol on my hip at the grocery store wondering if I'll even get a chance to draw before my skin melts off of my boiling body by an RPG explosion. Once the bad guys have RPGs, it suddenly seems a bit silly to carry anything else. As to your previous message: > I'd be interested in knowing how I'm as ignorant as people who [...] To be fair, ignorance is sometimes subjectively influenced by the ideals of the person judging. I see it as ignorant to completely ignore the topic of gun crime in our government. You see it as an acceptable loss, to be written off. We disagree here.