4 ms·
This article begins by saying that estimated land requirements are 4000 sq ft per person, but probably if you’re efficient you can drop that to 200 sq ft. That
by etrautmann 3y ago
This article begins by saying that estimated land requirements are 4000 sq ft per person, but probably if you’re efficient you can drop that to 200 sq ft. That 20x reduction out of nowhere makes me instantly question the rigor here.
- bryanlarsen 3y agoThere are several trivial ways to get way more than that efficiency difference. For example, switching from lettuce to potatoes. A greenhouse. That's not what the article is talking about, but it's enough pf a thought experiment to show that it's not necessarily unreasonable.