2 ms·
It feels very close to docker equivalent for WASM binaries which is very cool. I think this might be the breakthrough required to make wasm server-side very ma
by debarshri 3y ago
It feels very close to docker equivalent for WASM binaries which is very cool.
I think this might be the breakthrough required to make wasm server-side very mainstream. I think there is still complexity and standardization issues on compilation side. When that is solved then server-side wasm would be ready for democratization I think.
- skybrian 3y agoThe technology is interesting, but I've never bothered to install it. It seems like this ecosystem is missing compelling reasons to use it, sort of like a device or app store that's missing interesting apps. The demo they put on the front page doesn't really sell it. I already have Python installed. It's need that they got it running, but how is this better? What would sell it? Suppose there were a well-regarded hosting site that required uploads to be WebAssembly. Or maybe some popular app that required plugins to be written in WebAssembly.