4 ms·
Seeing as they're actually eating the frogs in question, it sounds like it's not just for fun and sport.
by HideousKojima 3y ago
Seeing as they're actually eating the frogs in question, it sounds like it's not just for fun and sport.
- 0daystock 3y ago[flagged]
- the__alchemist 3y agoAre you a vegetarian?
- lemao9988 3y agovisiting your family is not nexessary for survival or sustenance. In fact your survival most likely implies the destruction of habit for other animals thru consumption/farming
- shepherdjerred 3y agoSurvival is inherently selfish. Something has to die for you to live. That something might be a plant or animal. As long as you _attempt_ to minimize the suffering of what you're consuming, then eating plants over animals isn't morally superior. It also doesn't really matter if it's a cow, chicken or frog, as long as you're not making the animal suffer pointlessly.
- 0daystock 3y agoI already said I agreed survival is justification for eating animals. But this is not survival, this is sport, because they have a choice to eat something other than animals and still thrive.
- constantly 3y agoYour first sentence doesn’t seem to align with your second sentence. Can you clear up the confusion? Survival is justification for eating animals -> These people are bad because they eat animals but could eat non-animals to survive. Are you saying survival is justified to eat animals only if there are no other things to eat?
- 0daystock 3y agoYou seem capable of looking up the definition of "survival" on your own. Anyway, this discussion is not worth having on this oppressive site, because any controversial opinion is just flagged and censored by the majority of fragile-ego dimwits.