> It's not non-violent if it's causing harm. Oh man… that’s a slippery slope. Allows you to justify using force against all sorts of non-violent things you do

> It's not non-violent if it's causing harm. Oh man… that’s a slippery slope. Allows you to justify using force against all sorts of non-violent things you don’t like. See the many examples where aggressive force was used “for the greater good” in the 20th century if you want some spoilers for how that turns out.