4 ms·
Some people have argued that the fuzziness of the legal system can be a good feature for some reason, but you could always have a machine execute the law and a
by 0thgen 3y ago
Some people have argued that the fuzziness of the legal system can be a good feature for some reason, but you could always have a machine execute the law and a human make the final call. So you wouldn't need judges, juries, or lawyers, but you would need a team of legal shamans that sign off on verdicts
- hedora 3y agoThe problem isn’t checking the computer’s output. It is that the law would need to encode all the stuff I said, so it would need to be nuanced enough to replace all engineering, leadership and administration roles. (And also anything involving ethics.)