4 ms·
It feels like they eventually managed to enforce this when the App Store came along, rejecting “useless” or “redundant” apps. Eventually they gave up on that id
by corbezzoli 3y ago
It feels like they eventually managed to enforce this when the App Store came along, rejecting “useless” or “redundant” apps. Eventually they gave up on that idea because they loved seeing the number of apps rise, even if those apps were, in the end, low-quality software.
- plussed_reader 3y agoIf they didn't have hidden 1st party api stuff that 3rd parties have difficulty leveraging this moniker would feel more useful/relevant, IMO. In the current context they use these labels to protect their workflow from other entities.