Calling violent domestic terrorists engaged in attacks on police, property destruction, arson and other obviously criminal acts mere "environmental activists" i

Calling violent domestic terrorists engaged in attacks on police, property destruction, arson and other obviously criminal acts mere "environmental activists" is very disingenuous. It's like saying "a mathematician dies in prison after being jailed for using postal services". Technically it's not exactly a lie, but it omits so much relevant context that it is, for all practical purposes, a lie. And also a grave disservice to actual non-violent activists for preserving the environment who probably don't want to be identified with domestic terrorists under the same umbrella term.