3 ms·

Or not? Autopsy: Gunshot residue ‘not seen’ on activist killed at police training center https://www.ajc.com/news/crime/activist-killed-at-police-training-cen

Or not? Autopsy: Gunshot residue ‘not seen’ on activist killed at police training center https://www.ajc.com/news/crime/activist-killed-at-police-training-center-site-had-more-than-50-gunshot-wounds-autopsy-finds/RSL5T2D7WJDXNIULLBL6ZUZADE/ https://www.ajc.com/news/crime/activist-killed-at-police-tra... "According to the autopsy sent to ABC News, Teran did not have gunpowder residue on their hands. Officials claimed Teran fired the first shot at a state trooper." https://web.archive.org/web/20230419235728/https://abcnews.go.com/US/dekalb-county-releases-autopsy-cop-city-protester-manuel/story?id=98700731 https://web.archive.org/web/20230419235728/https://abcnews.g...

Quillbert182 3y ago
While true, how it was explained to me was that the autopsy did a visual inspection, while the GBI test, which was done afterwards, was a more thorough chemical one. However, I don’t have a source on this one.
zdragnar 3y ago
You're not going to see gunpowder residue without firing quite a few shots. The test is far more conclusion than a visual inspection.
- hedora 3y ago
  Well, he was shot over a dozen times at close range (probably while sitting with hands up), and both palms had exit wounds. I’m not sure how well visual inspection would work with all the blood and other carnage. However, I’m also not sure if trace gunshot residue will show up on current forensics tests if multiple people empty their clips into you from a few feet away. There’s also the question of why they shot him over a dozen times while he was unarmed.