3 ms·
A tidy argument, complicated by the fact that the NYT justifies its existence at least as often in terms of public good as of selling a product.
by throwanem 3y ago
A tidy argument, complicated by the fact that the NYT justifies its existence at least as often in terms of public good as of selling a product.
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> the NYT justifies its existence at least as often in terms of public good as of selling a product It can be both. Public goods don’t have to be accessible to everyone to benefit society.
- afavour 3y ago> justifies its existence at least as often in terms of public good as of selling a product. I’d be troubled by that if they were also taking public money to do so (ie state subsidy), but they aren’t. So what they claim is kinda meh.