Why are you so desperate for me to answer your irrelevant points with your out of date sources? > To which you said: >>> The internet is not the real world.

Why are you so desperate for me to answer your irrelevant points with your out of date sources? > To which you said: >>> The internet is not the real world. >> And then hid from my response about >> Tell that to Google, Microsoft, Apple... etc [4]. Welcome to the age of technology. >> And once again you are hiding from: >And your response, for the third time: Nothing! Ask yourself, do any of these big companies you listed allow you to purchase goods with Bitcoin in a real world store? No? Irrelevant point you made then. We both know that criminals like yourself use Coinjoin, and yet again this niche strategy is well known to lawmakers and it isn't going to fly with them. So here’s how this is going to go down: We all know that Monero is banned on most if not all exchanges [1, 2], KYC / AML checks are ramping up [3] and this will all lead to Coinjoin being effectively made illegal and the ATM slot machines being decommissioned. The more people that use coinjoin the more it will be targeted resulting in the above, even if you claim it doesn't affect you. You talk about ‘privacy’ yet the criminal activity with these tokens outweighs ANY fictional legitimate aspect of your use of Bitcoin. Any desperate measure you take will be blacklisted and you will (as always) be left holding the bag unable to cash out. > I can pay for the services I already listed in an above comment, without handing over my information to be breached or sold. We both know that the large amount of activity on crypto is used for speculation and ransomware that you're still too scared to answer. >>>> Kagi, vps providers, domain hosters, non-profits, email providers... Still repeating your useless 'MuH KaGi' non-argument? Kagi and those involved will be in trouble when the exchanges they try to cash out of detect a blacklisted conjoin address. They will be either forced to comply with KYC / AML or forced to pay huge KYC / AML fines like what Coinbase did. [4] So this how you plan to put a company out of business all for them to accept an energy intensive and wasting token that burns up the planet? Instead they will drop it like a rock and other merchants will do the same. And yet you still can't answer the ransomware question because you know I'm correct? > Going to keep running? I shouldn’t see you running to your Bitcoin slot machine to cash out in a flash crash when Bitcoin's price drops only for the ATM machine to be out of service, shutdown or you joining a very long queue with other criminals trying to cash out. 1 — https://www.thestreet.com/cryptocurrency/dubai-bans-all-privacy-coins https://www.thestreet.com/cryptocurrency/dubai-bans-all-priv... 2 — https://www.binance.com/en/feed/post/585415 https://www.binance.com/en/feed/post/585415 3 — https://cointelegraph.com/news/banks-with-crypto-services-require-new-anti-money-laundering-capabilities https://cointelegraph.com/news/banks-with-crypto-services-re... 4 — https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/01/04/coinbase-crypto-fine/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/01/04/coinbase-...