3 ms·
Thank you for the additional context. Is there any issue in principal with Zig supporting WASIX in the future (in a sustainable fashion)? Or is there any techni
by jadbox 3y ago
Thank you for the additional context. Is there any issue in principal with Zig supporting WASIX in the future (in a sustainable fashion)? Or is there any technical debate to just not support it?
- kristoff_it 3y agoGenerally speaking we're open to support all kinds of platforms going forward. We do have a roadmap and a series of priorities so adding new platforms is not our first priority right now. That said, interacting with the Zig project is not just a matter of code. Software development, especially when it comes to open source, happens as a result of a delicate social process, and the impact on our contributor community does factor in our decision making.
- epilys 3y agoWASIX is not even a standard by the Bytecode Alliance, which makes the webassembly specs.
- brighteyes 3y agoTo clarify, WebAssembly specs are made by the WebAssembly W3C community group here: https://www.w3.org/community/webassembly/ https://www.w3.org/community/webassembly/ Its true that many of those companies are also members of the Bytecode Alliance. But the W3C community group is where actual specs and standardization happen. That's where votes occur, and that's the Github organization in which they are published, and so forth.