3 ms·
I can’t help but wonder if it is really about them not wanting ways around their paywall and are just using this as a convenient cover
by dinkleberg 3y ago
I can’t help but wonder if it is really about them not wanting ways around their paywall and are just using this as a convenient cover
- bombcar 3y agoSaying it's for the paywall and not about silently updating articles would be more respectable, imo.
- chewmieser 3y agoThey haven’t said why they made this change at all, this article is just speculating about the desire to be able to make silent edits. The reasonable explanation would be to preserve their paywall. You know, that people tend to use “archive” sites to get around (e.g. archive.is).
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]