5 ms·
There are loads of total garbage sugary breakfast cereals available that are B. I mean literally stuff with 24% sugar. The label is completely worthless, ignore
by morsch 3y ago
There are loads of total garbage sugary breakfast cereals available that are B. I mean literally stuff with 24% sugar. The label is completely worthless, ignore it, just read the ingredients list and the dietary information.
https://www.lebensmittelklarheit.de/fragen-antworten/nutri-score-auf-suessem-muesli https://www.lebensmittelklarheit.de/fragen-antworten/nutri-s...
- Angostura 3y agoIf you read the question and answer, “completely useless “ is just silly. There are some cases where it fails. The people behind the score acknowledges that it’s not good for sugary cereals and say they will work to amend it
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- matthewaveryusa 3y agoAll the more reason to avoid anything below B then no? Or do you have a counter example of something rated below a B that you would recommend over the B rating?
- Obscurity4340 3y agoWhat do you think of those Kelloggs All-Bran Buds (think they're psyllium)? I do kinda wish they didn't add any sugar but with all the fibre and micronutrients, I feel like its pretty wholesome still...
- hedora 3y agoI tried those recently. They are a bit too sweet for my taste (though are somehow low sugar). My main issue with them is that Kelloggs uses glyphosate (round up) as a drying agent at harvest time. If I could find an organic version, I might buy them again.
- Obscurity4340 3y agoDid NOT know that, fuck!
- Obscurity4340 3y agoSo my $million question to you is what can I credibly replace it with? I love those buds cuz of the high magnesium and fibre