2 ms·
You're dead on about there being different botanical and culinary definitions, but I have never heard fish or poultry being excused as being meat. They are just
by PrimeMcFly 3y ago
You're dead on about there being different botanical and culinary definitions, but I have never heard fish or poultry being excused as being meat. They are just different types of meat.
- valleyer 3y agoI agree it's a weird distinction, but it's by no means an uncommon one. Christians in the US, for example, often consider fish not to be meat. https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/good-question-why-isnt-seafood-considered-meat/ https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/good-question-why-isn...
- PrimeMcFly 3y agoIn a religious context, that doesn't surprise me, but that's about the only context I think it would hold true for.