3 ms·

(They began counting in 1981)

• edhelas 3y ago
  Do I feel some climatoscepticism, or at least climatodenialism in this message ?
  • jiofj 3y ago
    [flagged]
    • netsharc 3y ago
      Funny you mention religion, the deniers also have their own religion, disputing facts with their own "facts" and "truth". So what about 1981? Do you think it means it could've been lower than right now in, say, the 1970s, but the liars conveniently only started counting from the decade after? Given we have temperature data from further back and we know higher temperature = ice melts, the scientific mind would conclude there's a correlation. But oh nooo, jiofj knows better, there could be something else affecting it!
  • jkhdigital 3y ago
    Pathologizing dissent is not going to change anyone’s mind.
    • Fricken 3y ago
      If something was going to change their mind it would be changed by now.
    • timeon 3y ago
      Nothing is going to.
  • pauldenton 3y ago
    Comparing criticisms of data, (testing of data being a key part of science) to denying the Holocaust isn't going to win anyone over. We've heard many inaccurate predictions before, an easy one being "2 Weeks to flatten the curve" or "If you get vaccinated you'll have a 98% protection rate and can no longer catch Covid"