3 ms·
No, not at all. Destroying something, well, destroys it. Rebuilding it then means you spent a lot of effort with nothing new to show for it. That’s the opposite
by Nifty3929 3y ago
No, not at all. Destroying something, well, destroys it. Rebuilding it then means you spent a lot of effort with nothing new to show for it. That’s the opposite of production.
- quantified 3y agoBut since you spent money on the rebuild, and money spent to make something shows up as economy, it looks positively productive. I think your point and mine together is that the way we measure economy has some horrible problems. Is there any economic measure of destruction?