> One thing I would point out is that the simplicity of StackOverflow's hardware stack means that it would also be very simple to host in a cloud provider like

> One thing I would point out is that the simplicity of StackOverflow's hardware stack means that it would also be very simple to host in a cloud provider like AWS. Yes, of course. Every cloud provider also does PaaS, but often it is also not the most cost effective option - often it is the most expensive one! The cheapest option is often the option where toy get reliant on cloud-specific sdks, serverless, etc.