4 ms·
That's good for you but not 99.99% of the population
by weird-eye-issue 3y ago
That's good for you but not 99.99% of the population
- tavavex 3y agoI honestly don't think that only 1 in every 10000 Adobe users own a modern-ish gaming-capable PC (and that's what's required to run SD as of now). Point being, the fact that you can already run these models on off-the-shelf consumer hardware is very promising, and as time goes on, more and more new hardware will be capable of running this.
- freeere 3y agoI assume that they actually use the hardware /GPU they have and might not be able to run SD next to it constantly without upgrading. But someone needs to make this possible and maintain such a solution which would cost also money.either you pay adobe what you already do or pay someone else who maintains the model, the infrastructure etc. Sure some will run it themselves but my guess is that this is a niche group of people as most don't care .
- Closi 3y agoOP will have been exaggerating with 99.99%, but I suspect 90% of people don't have a PC with something equivalent to a 3080. And designing your software to a minimum-spec of a 3080 would be pretty wild.
- tavavex 3y agoBut a 3080 is by no means a minimum requirement - not even close. A 3080 will give you a very comfortable experience, sure, but so will a midrange card from the same generation. And people have been squeezing SD on way less powerful hardware - even most cards from the GTX 10 series (that came out in 2016) can be made to run it, although some sacrifices have to be made below 6GB of VRAM.
- gmerc 3y agoeven consumer GPUs have massive generational speedup. In the mid term, cloud will be hard pressed unless Nvidia aims at depressing consumers (leaving themselves open to attacks from everyone else on that market segment)
- realusername 3y agoPeople using Adobe products tend to have better hardware than the average